By Sydney Smith
The Sydney Morning Herald retracted and said it was â€œwrongâ€ to publish a July 26 cartoon about Gaza that has been called racist.
The Sydney Morning Herald apologized for this cartoon today. (Credit: Sydney Morning Herald)
In an August 3 editorial, the Sydney Morning Herald admitted the cartoon â€œinvoked an inappropriate element of religion, rather than nationhood, and made a serious error of judgment.â€
The cartoon by Glen Le Lievre depicted â€œan elderly man, with a large nose, sitting alone, with a remote control device in his hand, overseeing explosions in Gaza,â€ according to the newspaper. His armchair had a Star of David on it, â€œand the man was wearing a kippah, a religious skullcap.â€
Critics compared the image to that of propaganda from Nazi Germany, the newspaper reported. Initially, the newspaper defended the cartoon, pointing out that Le Lievreâ€™s â€œdistinctive drawing style routinely sees old people depicted with large noses and pronounced facial featuresâ€ as part of his drawing style. Further, the newspaper explained that Le Lievreâ€™s cartoon was inspired by â€œnews photographs of men seated in chairs and lounges, observing the shelling of Gaza.â€
One such photo that shows that is the below AFP/Getty Images picture, tracked down by the Daily Mail.
Another photo was published by UPI/Landov/Barcroft Media, via the Guardian.
The Sydney Morning Herald said it originally denied that Le Lievre intended â€œracial vilification,â€ but now understands the cartoon wasnâ€™t acceptable. â€œIt was wrong to publish the cartoon in its original form,â€ the newspaperâ€™s editors wrote. â€œWe apologise unreservedly for this lapse, and the anguish and distress that has been caused.â€
The newspaperâ€™s editor Darren Goodsir told the Guardian Australia that he decided to apologize â€œafter a long 10 days of serious thinking, and reflection.â€
Complaints over Cartoon, Column
The New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies complained to the Herald about the cartoon.
â€œIn our view this is racial vilification, not only in the sense of offending, insulting, humiliating and intimidating Jews as a group, but also in the sense of inciting third parties to hatred of Jews,â€ Miller wrote, according to Israeli newspaper Haaretz.
Likewise, the Anti-Defamation Commission of the Bâ€™nai Bâ€™rithâ€™s chair Dvir Abramovich complained the article is like â€œvenomous propagandaâ€ of the Nazis, Haaretz reported.
â€œThe cartoon portrays not just Israelis, but all Jews, as heartless, cold-blooded murderers.â€
The cartoon accompanied an opinion column by Mike Carlton. Carlton also received criticism for his article,â€Israelâ€™s rank and rotten fruit is being called fascism.â€
The Australian Jewish News wrote of Carltonâ€™s column:
â€œNot only were we treated to baseless accusations of â€˜genocideâ€™ and â€˜ethnic cleansingâ€™ on Israelâ€™s part, but then there was a subtle shift. These were crimes being committed by â€˜a people with a proud liberal tradition of scholarship and culture, who hold the Warsaw Ghetto and the six million dead of the Holocaust at the centre of their race memory.â€™
â€œThis column was no longer about a country, this was about a people and a race â€“ a people and a race who should know better because of what they themselves went through. In short, you Jews are the same as the Nazis, worse perhaps because you choose to ignore the lessons of your own history.â€
Jewish news organization the JTA called it â€œvirulently anti-Israel.â€
Carlton stood by his column and wrote about the criticism on Twitter.
iMediaEthics has written to the cartoonist Le Lievre and the Sydney Morning Heraldâ€™s editor Darren Goodsir for comment.