This pro-Morsi poster was raised above the Al Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem on Friday. (Image: Facebook/The Palestinian Information Center)
NEW YORK â€“ Putting an end to Egyptâ€™s deepening polarization and rising bloodshed requires one urgent first step: the reinstatement of Mohamed Mursi as Egyptâ€™s duly elected president. His removal by military coup was unjustified. While it is true that millions of demonstrators opposed Mursiâ€™s rule, even massive street protests do not constitute a valid case for a military coup in the name of the â€œpeopleâ€ when election results repeatedly say otherwise.
There is no doubt that Egyptian society is deeply divided along sectarian, ideological, class, and regional lines. Yet the country has gone to the polls several times since the February 2011 overthrow of Mubarakâ€™s 30-year rule. The results have demonstrated strong popular support for Islamist parties and positions, though they also make clear the countryâ€™s schisms.
In late 2011 and early 2012, Egypt held parliamentary elections. Mursiâ€™s Freedom and Justice Party, created by the Muslim Brotherhood, secured a plurality, and the two major Islamist blocs together received roughly two-thirds of the vote. In June 2012, Mursi defeated his rival Ahmed Shafik, Mubarakâ€™s final prime minister, by a margin of 52-48% to win the presidency. In a national referendum in December 2012, a 64% majority of those voting approved a draft constitution backed by the Muslim Brotherhood (though turnout was low).
The secular argument that Mursiâ€™s lust for power jeopardized Egyptâ€™s nascent democracy does not bear scrutiny. Secular, military, and Mubarak-era foes of the Muslim Brotherhood have used every lever at their disposal, democratic or not, to block the Islamist partiesâ€™ democratic exercise of power. This is consistent with a decades-old pattern in Egyptian history, in which the Brothers â€“ and Islamist political forces in general â€“ were outlawed, and their members imprisoned, tortured, and exiled.
Claims that Mursi ruled undemocratically stem from his repeated attempts to extricate the popularly elected parliament and presidency from anti-democratic traps set by the military. After the Islamist partiesâ€™ huge victory in the 2011-2012 parliamentary elections, the military leadership and the Supreme Court (filled with Mubarak-era judges) worked to derail the new parliament and prevent it from establishing an assembly to draft a new constitution.
The key action came in June 2012, when the Supreme Court, staffed entirely with Mubarak-era holdovers, nullified the results of the parliamentary elections on specious grounds. The military was set to reassert full legislative powers.
Mursiâ€™s subsequent victory in the presidential election therefore set up an epic battle over the future of the parliament and the constitution, as Mursi attempted to protect the democratically elected parliament while the military fought to dissolve it. In the end, Mursi insisted that the elected parliament create a constitutional assembly, which produced the draft approved in the December 2012 referendum.
As is typical of political revolutions, Egyptâ€™s economic situation has gone from bad to worse in the course of these power struggles. Revolutions tend to confront new governments with steeply rising social demands (for wage increases and higher welfare spending, for example) at a time of capital flight, financial turmoil, and deep disruptions of production. In Egyptâ€™s case, the crucial tourist sector contracted sharply after the revolution. Unemployment soared, the currency depreciated, and food prices rose dangerously.
None of this is surprising, and little of it can be managed by a new government that lacks experience, market confidence, and full control of the levers of power. Historically, outside parties have thus played a decisive role. Will foreign governments and the International Monetary Fund extend vital finances to the new government, or will they let it flounder and drown in a tsunami of currency depreciation and inflation?
Here, the feckless West â€“ torn between its democratic rhetoric and its antipathy to the Islamists â€“ showed its hand. The result was equivocation and delay, rather than commitment and assistance. The IMF has talked with the Egyptian government for two and a half years since Mubarakâ€™s overthrow without so much as lending a single cent, sealing the Egyptian economyâ€™s fate and contributing to public unrest and the recent coup.
It appears from press reports that the West finally gave the green light to the Egyptian military to overthrow Mursi, arrest the Muslim Brotherhoodâ€™s leadership, and repress the Islamist rank and file. US President Barack Obamaâ€™s unwillingness to stand up for Egyptâ€™s elected leaders, or even to label their overthrow a â€œcoupâ€ (thereby protecting the continued flow of US funds to the Egyptian military), shows that when push came to shove, the West sided with the anti-Islamists in subverting democracy. Of course, in classic Orwellian fashion, the West did so in democracyâ€™s name.
The coup and the Westâ€™s complacency about it (if not complicity in it) could devastate Egypt. The Islamists are neither a marginal political group nor a terrorist force. They represent a large part of Egyptâ€™s population, perhaps half or more, and are certainly the countryâ€™s best-organized political force. The attempt to repress the Muslim Brotherhood and to deny Mursi the presidency to which he was elected will most likely lead to massive violence and the strangulation of democracy, however the West and Egyptian anti-Islamists try to justify their actions.
At this point, the correct course for the West would be to call on Egyptâ€™s military to reinstate Mursi; to offer prompt financing to help stabilize the Egyptian economy; and to support true pluralism, not the kind that reverts to military coups when elections produce inconvenient results.
True pluralism means accepting the strength of Islamist political forces in the new Egypt and other countries in the region. Short of this, the West will most likely end up as an accomplice to Egyptâ€™s continuing downward spiral into violence and economic collapse.
Jeffrey D. Sachs is Professor of Sustainable Development, Professor of Health Policy and Management, and Director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University.