By Bradley Klapper
Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., speaks to reporters on Capitol Hill. Boxer is pushing the idea of visa waivers in the Senate. (File Photo/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS)
WASHINGTON â€” The Obama administration and Congress could soon clash over legislation that would let Israelis visit the United States without visas, but that would not demand full reciprocal treatment for all Americans wishing to travel to the Jewish state.
Israelâ€™s entry into the 37-nation U.S. Visa Waiver Program is the most controversial element in a pair of broader U.S.-Israel bills dealing with everything from improving cybersecurity to enhancing economic cooperation. Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen is hoping to get the House Foreign Affairs Committeeâ€™s approval before Congressâ€™ August recess. A version by Sen. Barbara Boxer is picking up support in the Senate.
Both would create a new category of U.S. ally â€” â€˜â€™major strategic partnerâ€™â€™ â€” designating Israel as the only such nation. The bills would call for the inclusion of Israel on a list of countries whose citizens can visit the United States for up to 90 days without a visa, granted they register electronically before boarding a flight.
The administration and some lawmakers are concerned the legislation doesnâ€™t do enough to eliminate Israeli discrimination against Palestinians and Arab-Americans seeking to cross its borders. They also say Israel still fails to meet other legal requirements for the program.
The Senate bill, for example, would demand only that the Israeli government make â€˜â€™every reasonable effort, without jeopardizing the security of the state of Israel, to ensure that reciprocal travel privileges are extended to all United States citizens.â€™â€™ And it would grant Israel an exemption from a waiver program entry requirement that it first reach a 97 percent approval rate for its applicants seeking U.S. visas.
The House bill has clear bipartisan backing, with more than 300 co-sponsors. The Senate effort now has 45 co-sponsors, bringing it close to a majority. It is likely to be considered by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in September.
Some critics are sensitive about expressing their reservations in public, wishing to avoid getting in a public argument with a close ally, with the billsâ€™ supporters or with the powerful pro-Israel lobby AIPAC, which is pushing for the legislationâ€™s passage.
Boxer told The Associated Press the law would benefit U.S. citizens by specifically requiring the secretaries of state and homeland security to certify that Israel is doing all it can to facilitate travel for Americans before it can enter the visa waiver program. â€˜â€™This bipartisan bill would give the United States leverage to ensure that Israel welcomes Americans into the country,â€™â€™ she said.
But critics believe they see a problematic loophole.
Last month, 15 Democratic members of Congress and one Republican wrote a letter to Israelâ€™s ambassador in Washington expressing concern that Israeli border officials were â€˜â€™disproportionately singling out, detaining and denying entry to Arab and Muslim Americans.â€™â€™ They demanded equal treatment, according to the letter obtained by the AP.
One case they detailed was that of Nour Joudah, a teacher at a U.S.-funded school in the West Bank who was twice denied entry into Israel despite holding a valid multiple-entry visa. They also complained about Israel providing some Americans with restrictive visas that allow them into Palestinian-controlled territory, but not into Israel, forcing them to travel overland from Jordan instead of arriving at Tel Avivâ€™s international airport.
Other problems cited included instances of Israeli border officials blocking Americans at the border because of their political views and cases of U.S. citizens being forced to provide authorities with access to their personal email accounts at the risk of deportation.
â€˜â€™We have very strong concerns about the bill. It allows for the discrimination of U.S. citizens by another country,â€™â€™ said Abed Ayoub, legal director of the American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee. â€˜â€™It is reprehensible that U.S. congressional members would allow for such action to take place.â€™â€™
The State Department and Department of Homeland Security have expressed similar, if narrower, arguments in closed meetings with lawmakers, according to U.S. officials with knowledge of the talks. Those officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they werenâ€™t authorized to speak publicly about the matter. They said the administration was working with Israel to improve its border screening methods and with Congress on the wording of any future law. The State Department declined to comment.
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS