Sorry to hear you got fired by National Public Radio for saying on Fox that you get nervous when you see Muslims on a plane with you. It was dumb to say such a thing, but I donâ€™t think saying one dumb thing should be a firing offense. (I DO think an NPR journalist wanting to take money from Fox News to be a regular commentator should be a firing offense, but thatâ€™s another story). But thereâ€™s more to this — and some important things that everyone is missing.
For instance, what you said about Faisal Shazad, the Pakistani immigrant who wanted to bomb Times Square. When he was being sentenced this month, he claimed, according to you, that his attempted attack was just â€œthe first drop of blood.â€ We canâ€™t let political correctness blind us to this, you explained.
I guess Shahzad made a big impression on you, because after being fired you went back on Fox and told them, â€œYou canâ€™t ignore the fact what has recently been said in court with regard to â€˜this is the first drop of blood in a Muslim war against America.â€™â€
Sadly for you (and this is also why you shouldnâ€™t be working for a real news organization like NPR), Shahzad never said that. If you were a real journalist, you would have quoted him accurately. What he actually said was that he was the â€œfirst droplet of the flood,â€ not blood. But I know how easy it is to mishear things when scary Muslims are talking. And I guess itâ€™s not a huge difference anyway. What really matters is that youâ€™re 100% right: We shouldnâ€™t let political correctness stop us from paying close attention to what people like Shahzad say. The problem is you just havenâ€™t taken it far enough.
So Juan, Iâ€™m asking you to join me on a crusade — whoops! scratch that, letâ€™s call it a â€œmissionâ€ — to publicize these statements by Faisal Shahzad as widely as possible. Because most of the media have not spent much time on what he had to say.
Hereâ€™s what he said at his recent sentencing (after talking about being a droplet in a flood):
â€œ[Saladin] liberated Muslim lands … And thatâ€™s what we Muslims are trying do, because youâ€™re occupying Iraq and Afghanistan…So, the past nine years the war with Muslims has achieved nothing for the U.S., except for it has waken up the Muslims for Islam. We are only Muslims trying to defend our people, honor, and land. But if you call us terrorists for doing that, then we are proud terrorists, and we will keep on terrorizing until you leave our land and people at peace.â€
And this is what Shahzad said when he pled guilty back in June:
â€œI want to plead guilty, and Iâ€™m going to plead guilty 100 times over, because until the hour the U.S. pulls its forces from Iraq and Afghanistan, and stops the drone strikes in Somalia and Yemen and in Pakistan, and stops the occupation of Muslim lands, and stops killing the Muslims, and stops reporting the Muslims to its government, we will be attacking U.S., and I plead guilty to that.â€™â€™
Then thereâ€™s email that Shahzad sent to a friend in 2006:
â€œEveryone knows the current situation of Muslim World… Friends with peaceful protest! Can you tell me a way to save the oppressed? And a way to fight back when rockets are fired at us and Muslim blood flows? In Palestine, Afghan, Iraq, Chechnya and else where.â€
And then thereâ€™s what Shahzad was telling friends and relatives even before that:
Mr. Shahzad had long been critical of American foreign policy. â€œHe was always very upset about the fabrication of the W.M.D. stunt to attack Iraq and killing non-combatants such as the sons and grandson of Saddam Hussein,â€ said a close relative. In 2003, Mr. Shahzad had been copied on a Google Groups e-mail message bearing photographs of GuantÃ¡namo Bay detainees, handcuffed and crouching, below the words â€œShame on you, Bush. Shame on You.â€
So what do you say, Juan? Now that you have a new $2 million contract with Fox, let me come on with you for some in-depth discussions about the terroristsâ€™ real motivations. We canâ€™t let another day go by letting the PC brigade stop us from telling the truth: Terrorists arenâ€™t trying to kill us because they hate our freedom. Theyâ€™re killing us because weâ€™re in their countries killing them.
Yours, Michael Moore
P.S. If you want to understand suicide bombings, be sure to read the new book that studied every instance of it for the past 30 years. Itâ€™s been used by many groups of many religions, not just Arabs and not just Muslims. And almost all such terrorism has one motivation in common: occupation by foreign militaries.
P.P.S. Hereâ€™s something else that Iâ€™d sincerely love to talk about with you: what do you think when you see rich middle-aged white men talking on TV about how they get nervous around African Americans on the street? And then they explain that we canâ€™t let political correctness stop us from talking about black-on-white crime?
Does it drive you crazy that they say this without even being conscious of the history of far greater violence by white people toward blacks? And do you maybe understand now how those middle-aged white guys get it so wrong?
UPDATE: Juan, you probably remember in 1986 when the Washington Post Magazine ran a Richard Cohen column defending jewelry store owners who wouldnâ€™t buzz in young black men. It caused such a big controversy that the New Republic ran a bunch of responses to it, including one by you. You might find it interesting to go back and read what you wrote then — for instance, â€œRacism is a lazy manâ€™s substitute for using good judgment … Common sense becomes racism when skin color becomes a formula for figuring out who is a danger to me.â€
Michael Moore is an Academy-Award winning filmmaker and best-selling author