April 26, 2013: As with many â€œterrorismâ€ related events since 9/11, the Boston bombing official narrative proves to be a web of lies as important facts are revealed. It turns out that the FBI has lied about its knowledge of the alleged suspects, Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, already being presented as guilty not only in the mainstream press but by the President himself.
According to the suspectsâ€™ mother, the FBI had been following them for years:
The FBI originally feigned ignorance over the identity of the two Boston bombing suspects, Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, as they appealed to an unwitting public to help them â€œidentifyâ€ and â€œfindâ€ the suspects. […]
Russia Today, in an article titled, â€œâ€˜They were set up, FBI followed them for yearsâ€™- Tsarnaevsâ€™ mother to RT,â€ stated of the suspectsâ€™ mother:
But her biggest suspicion surrounding the case was the constant FBI surveillance she said her family was subjected to over the years. She is surprised that having been so stringent with the entire family, the FBI had no idea the sons were supposedly planning a terrorist act.
She would say of the FBI to Russia Today:
They used to come [to our] home, they used to talk to me…they were telling me that he [the older, 26-y/o Tamerlan] was really an extremist leader and that they were afraid of him. They told me whatever information he is getting, he gets from these extremist sites…they were controlling him, they were controlling his every step…and now they say that this is a terrorist act! Never ever is this true, my sons are innocent!
[…] The FBI would then be forced to concede that indeed it had interviewed the suspects, in 2011, two years before the Boston bombings. (Tony Cartalucci Boston Bombing Suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev Reported Killed, Was Alive When Detained: Tamerlanâ€™s Aunt, Global Research, April 22, 2013.)
We were also told that Tamerlan Tsarnaev was killed in an exchange of gunfire after he and his brother had robbed a 7-Eleven:
When the shootout ended, one of the suspects, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, 26, a former boxer, had been shot and fatally wounded. He was wearing explosives, several law enforcement officials said. (Katharine Q. Seelye, William K. Rashbaum and Michael Cooper 2nd Bombing Suspect Caught After Frenzied Hunt Paralyzes Boston, The New York Times, April 19, 2013.)
With a bomb strapped to his chest, one of the Boston Marathon suspects was killed early Friday after he and his accomplice brother robbed a 7-Eleven, shot a police officer to death, carjacked an SUV and hurled explosives in an extraordinary firefight with law enforcement, authorities told NBC News. (Pete Williams, Richard Esposito, Michael Isikoff and Erin McClam, NBC News, One Boston Marathon suspect killed; second suspect, his brother, on loose after firefight, NBC News, April 19, 2013.)
The events surrounding Tamerlanâ€™s death reported by the media are simply not true. It turns out that Tamerlanâ€™ aunt identified him as a â€œnaked, cuffed, clearly alive and well detainee seen in video aired by CNNâ€:
Tamerlan Tsarnaev in custody
Was Tamerlan Assassinated?
The Boston Globe confirmed that Marathon Bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev was in custody, contradicting earlier reports that he had been killed in crossfire. If he was in custody and is now dead, does that not suggest that he might have been the object of an extrajudicial assassination? The circumstances of his death remain to be clarified.
Moreover, the 7-Eleven robbery was actually unrelated to the Tsarnaev brothers:
There was a 7-Eleven robbery in Cambridge last night, but it had nothing to do with the Boston Marathon bombing suspects.
Margaret Chabris, the director of corporate communication at 7- Eleven, says the surveillance video of the crime was not taken at a 7-Eleven and that the suspect that did rob the 7-Eleven does not look like Tamerlan or Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.
â€œThe suspect in the photos for that particular 7-Eleven robbery looks nothing like the suspects,â€ Chabris says. â€œThe police or someone made a mistake. Someone was confused.â€
[…] Again, they might be guilty. But as Glenn Greenwald notes:
The overarching principle here should be that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is entitled to a presumption of innocence until he is actually proven guilty. As so many cases have proven â€“ from accused (but exonerated) anthrax attacker Stephen Hatfill to accused (but exonerated) Atlanta Olympic bomber Richard Jewell to dozens if not hundreds of Guantanamo detainees accused of being the â€œworst of the worstâ€ but who were guilty of nothing â€“ people who appear to be guilty based on government accusations and trials-by-media are often completely innocent. Media-presented evidence is no substitute for due process and an adversarial trial. (Washingtonâ€™s Blog, Boston Terror Narrative Starts Falling Apart, Global Research, April 23, 2013)
On April 19 Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was arrested and brought to a hospital. According to Reuters, â€œDzhokhar Tsarnaev was wounded during at least one of two gun battles with police on Friday, suffering gunshot wounds to his head, neck, legs and hand […]â€œ. On April 24, the Huffington Post reported:
Two U.S. officials say the surviving suspect in the Boston bombings was unarmed when police captured him hiding inside a boat in a neighborhood back yard.
Authorities originally said they had exchanged gunfire with Dzhokhar Tsarnaev for more than one hour Friday evening before they were able to subdue him. (Adam Goldman and Pete Yost, Boston Bombing Suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev Reportedly Unarmed When Arrested In Boat, Officials Say, Huffington Post, April 24, 2013.)
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was unarmed and obviously brutalized by police
We still donâ€™t know what really happened in Boston and who committed the attacks even though the mainstream media report that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev has admitted being guilty. What we know for sure is that the official Boston bombing narrative is filled with lies and that since 9/11 and in the context of the fictitious â€œWar on Terrorâ€, Western governments, intelligence agencies and mainstream media have proven to be untrustworthy sources of information on alleged â€œterrorist attacksâ€ or â€œfoiled terrorist plotsâ€.
Canadaâ€™s Complicity in the War on Terror
Three days after Boston was locked down, invaded by a colossal police-military apparatus on a surreal â€œteenagehuntâ€, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police made a very timely announcement: they had foiled a terrorist plot targeting a Via Rail passenger train. Or so they say.
In a very absurd press conference where three RCMP officers repeatedly answered questions with â€œwe cannot comment as the investigation is ongoingâ€, the only information they seemed very eager to disclose was that the suspects â€œreceived guidance from Al-Qaeda in Iranâ€.
RCMP press conference
While the Canadian mainstream media take these RCMP allegations at face value, independent news outlets suspect hidden political motives behind the highly publicized announcement:
Neither the police nor government have given any reason as to why, after allowing the accused to remain at large for months, they were suddenly arrested Monday afternoon and in a very high-profile manner. […]
Speaking Tuesday after Jaserâ€™s arraignment in a Toronto court, his lawyer, John Norris, drew attention to the timing of the police-government announcement that they had uncovered Canadaâ€™s first â€œal-Qaeda-sponsoredâ€ terror plot. Said Norris, â€œThe timing of the arrest is a bit of a mystery and certainly I would like to hear the RCMPâ€™s explanation for that. They have been very clear that there is no risk of public safety and it is surprising to say the least that this arrest would be made now, close on the heels of what happened in Boston and timed perfectly with what was happening in the House of Commons yesterday.â€
On Friday, the Conservative government announced that it was changing the House of Commonsâ€™ agenda, scheduling third and final reading of its â€œCombating Terrorism Actâ€ (Bill S-7) to begin Monday and conclude this week. Bill S-7 gives the state vast new powers. These include: the right to hold terrorism suspects for 72 hours without charge, to convene â€œinvestigative hearingsâ€ at which those believed to have information about an imminent terrorist attack are stripped of their right to remain silent, and the power to place restrictions for up to a year on the movements and rights of persons deemed by the state to be terrorist suspects but against whom they have insufficient evidence to lay charges. […]
US authorities have been quick to trumpet the Canadian claims of a thwarted terrorist attackâ€”claims that boost their own efforts to portray North America as under siege from terrorists and justify a vast expansion of the national-security apparatus and coercive powers of the state. The US ambassador to Canada, David Jacobson, issued a statement Monday saying the arrests of Esseghaier and Jaser â€œwere the result of extensive cross-border cooperationâ€ and had underscored â€œthat we face serious and real threats.â€ […]
At Mondayâ€™s press conference, the RCMP asserted that Esseghaier and Jaser had acted under the â€œdirection and guidanceâ€ of â€œal-Qaeda elements located in Iran.â€
The RCMP said that they had no evidence of Iranian government involvement. […]
The Harper Conservative government, which has declared itself Israelâ€™s strongest ally and has expanded Canadaâ€™s decadesâ€™ old military-strategic alliance with Washington, broke off diplomatic relations with Teheran last summer. In justifying this action, Conservative Foreign Minister John Baird labeled Iran â€œthe most significant threat to global peace and security in the world today.â€ (Keith Jones Canadian Government unveils â€œTerror Plotâ€ as it Adopts Draconian New Law, World Socialist Web Site, April 24, 2013.)
We may recall a â€œterrorist plotâ€ revealed in late November 2001. According to mainstream reports, Ahmed Ressam, who was convicted of plotting to bomb Los Angeles International Airport in 1999, had also planned to bomb a Montreal area with â€œthe most visible concentration of Jews in Canada â€” a vibrant area of some 5,000 ultra-Orthodox Jews who stand out because of their traditional outfits of black coats and hats for men, long skirts and wigs for women. Â» (Ingrid Peritz, Montrealâ€™s brush with terror, The Globe and Mail, November 30, 2001.)
The Globe stated further:
Members of the Hasidic community in Outremont responded with shock after hearing that Mr. Ressam and Samir Ait Mohamed wanted to detonate a bomb in the area because it was predominantly Jewish.
The stated choice of explosives â€” a bomb on a gasoline truck â€” evoked the detonating power of the fuel-laden planes that ripped through the World Trade Center. (Ibid.)
Samir AÃ¯t Mohamed happened to be a fake Algerian refugee and â€œan informant for Canadian law-enforcement authorities [RCMP].â€ (Mike Carter, Montreal bomb plot revealed in Ressam case documents, Seattle Times, November 30, 2001.)
The Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) was also involved in a terrorist plot. Joseph Gilles Breault, a.k.a. Youssef Mouammar or Abou Djihad, had threatened to attack the Montreal metro with a biochemical weapon in 1998. He was a CSIS agent.
With that in mind, the latest RCMP â€œexploitâ€ raises even more questions on this revived Al-Qaeda threat focused on Iran. Whoâ€™s behind Al-Qaeda in Iran?:
As the FBI reels from what now appears to be revelations it was directly involved in the Boston Marathon bombings, a deluge of FBI â€œsuccessâ€ stories have been â€œserendipitouslyâ€ splashed across Western headlines. Among them was an allegedly â€œfoiledâ€ terror attack in Canada, reported to be the work of terrorists supported by â€œAl-Qaeda operatives in Iran.â€ The Globe and Mail, in its report, â€œCanada joins U.S. in alleging al-Qaeda has operatives based in Iran,â€ states:
[…] The Sunni-based al-Qaeda and Shia Iran belong to different branches of Islam that have been at odds historically. But in recent years U.S. officials have formally alleged that Iran has allowed al-Qaeda members to operate out of its territory.â€
[…] Hersh in his 2008 New Yorker piece titled, â€œPreparing the Battlefield: The Bush Administration steps up its secret moves against Iran,â€ spelled out a damning indictment of US involvement in bolstering, arming, and funding terror organizations, not linked to, but described as actually being Al Qaeda […]:
One of the most active and violent anti-regime groups in Iran today is the Jundallah, also known as the Iranian Peopleâ€™s Resistance Movement, which describes itself as a resistance force fighting for the rights of Sunnis in Iran. â€œThis is a vicious Salafi organization whose followers attended the same madrassas as the Taliban and Pakistani extremists,â€ Nasr told me. â€œThey are suspected of having links to Al Qaeda and they are also thought to be tied to the drug culture.â€ The Jundallah took responsibility for the bombing of a busload of Revolutionary Guard soldiers in February, 2007. At least eleven Guard members were killed. According to Baer and to press reports,the Jundallah is among the groups in Iran that are benefiting from U.S. support. (Tony Cartalucci, Who is Behind â€œAl Qaeda in Iranâ€?, Global Research, April 23, 2013.)
Otherwise the brothersâ€™ links to Chechen terrorists makes very little sense, since the latter, like many other terrorist groups and/or so-called freedom fighters depending on the strategy of the day, have been supported by the US:
What is abundantly clear is that the US government is not committed to fighting terrorists.
Quite the opposite. US intelligence has been recruiting and grooming terrorists for more than thirty years, while at same time upholding the absurd notion that these terrorists, who are bona fide CIA â€œintelligence assetsâ€, constitute a threat to the American Homeland. These alleged threats by â€œAn Outside Enemyâ€ are part of a propaganda ploy behind the â€œGlobal War on Terrorismâ€ (GWOT).
[…] The development of an Islamist terrorist militia in different countries around the World is part of an intricate US intelligence project.
While the Tsarnaev brothers are casually accused without evidence of having links to Chechen terrorists, the important question is who is behind the Chechen terrorists?
In an utterly twisted logic, the protagonists of the â€˜Global War on Terrorismâ€ directed against Muslims are the de facto architects of â€œIslamic terrorism.â€ (Michel Chossudovsky, BOSTON TRUTH: The â€œChechen Connectionâ€, Al Qaeda and the Boston Marathon Bombings, Global Research, April 22, 2013.)
Even former US Ambassador Craig Murray says the â€œChechen Connexionâ€ story is surreal:
We are asked to believe that Tamerlan Tsarnaev was identified by the Russian government as an extremist Dagestani or Chechen Islamist terrorist, and they were so concerned about it that in late 2010 they asked the US government to take action. At that time, the US and Russia did not normally have a security cooperation relationship over the Caucasus, particularly following the Russian invasion of Georgia in 2008. For the Russians to ask the Americans for assistance, Tsarnaev must have been high on their list of worries.
In early 2011 the FBI interview Tsarnaev and trawl his papers and computers but apparently â€“ remarkably for somebody allegedly radicalised by internet â€“ the habitually paranoid FBI find nothing of concern.
So far, so weird. But now this gets utterly incredible. In 2012 Tamerlan Tsarnaev, who is of such concern to Russian security, is able to fly to Russia and pass through the airport security checks of the worldâ€™s most thoroughly and brutally efficient security services without being picked up.
He is then able to proceed to Dagestan â€“ right at the heart of the worldâ€™s heaviest military occupation and the worldâ€™s most far reaching secret police surveillance â€“ again without being intercepted, and he is able there to go through some form of terror training or further Islamist indoctrination. He then flies out again without any intervention by the Russian security services.
That is the official story and I have no doubt it did not happen. I know Russia and I know the Russian security services. Whatever else they may be, they are extremely well-equipped, experienced and efficient and embedded into a social fabric accustomed to cooperation with their mastery.
This scenario is simply impossible in the real world. (Craig Murray, The Boston Bombings and the FBI: â€œOfficial Tsarnaev Story Makes No Senseâ€, 21st Century Wire, April 22, 2013.)
The idea that Tamerlan was, in fact, a US intelligence asset seems closer to the truth, since according to a Russian newspaper, he attended a US-sponsored workshop in the Caucasus, the goal of which was to destabilize southern regions of Russia:
Today, Russian newspaper Izvestia alleges that the older Boston Tamarlan bombing brother attended a workshop â€“ sponsored by an American organization â€“ on destabilizing the Russian satellite states:
At the disposal of â€œIzvestiaâ€ has documents Counterintelligence Department Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia, confirming that the Georgian organization â€œFund of Caucasusâ€ [hereâ€™s their website], which cooperates with the U.S. non-profit organization â€œJamestownâ€ (the board of directors of NGOs previously entered one of the ideologists of U.S. foreign policy, Zbigniew Brzezinski), was engaged in recruiting residents North Caucasus to work in the interests of the United States and Georgia.
According to the reports of Colonel Chief Directorate Counterintelligence Department Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia Gregory Chanturia to the Minister of Internal Affairs Irakli Garibashvili,â€œCaucasian fundâ€ in cooperation with the Foundation â€œJamestownâ€ in the summer of 2012 conducted workshops and seminars for young people of the Caucasus, including its Russian part. Some of them attended Tsarnaev Tamerlane, who was in Russia from January to July 2012.
â€œCaucasian fundâ€ writes Tchanturia was established November 7, 2008, just after the Georgian-Ossetian conflict, â€œto control the processes taking place in the North Caucasus region.â€ Accordingly, the Department of the Interior Ministry counterintelligence case was brought intelligence operations called â€œDTVâ€. Main purpose is to recruit young people and intellectuals of the North Caucasus to enhance instability and extremism in the southern regions of Russia. (Washingtonâ€™s Blog, Was Boston Bomber â€œRadicalizedâ€ at a U.S. Sponsored Counterterrorism Workshop, Global Research, April 24, 2013.)
Overall, the Boston tragedy is clearly and sadly being exploited to revamp the â€œWar on terrorâ€, justify the police state apparatus in the US and other Western countries such as Canada, and legitimize attacks on our rights and liberties.
Global Research brings to the attention of its readers a list of articles on this very important topic.