The Candidates on Islam

Wilfredo Amr Ruiz, Muslim Chaplain, Attorney and Political Analyst


Republican presidential candidates (L-R) Texas Governor Rick Perry, former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, businessman Herman Cain, former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-GA), U.S. Representative Michele Bachmann (R-MN), stand at attention during the singing of the national anthem during the CNN GOP National Security debate in Washington, November 22, 2011.


As republican voters near the time to elect their presidential candidate for the 2012 election, the candidates’ respective religious perspectives become significant to many. One topic that does not escape public scrutiny is the candidates’ stand on Islam and Muslims in America. It has become an important issue that calls the attention of both Muslim and non-Muslim voters. Noticeably some candidates appear not to realize that the American Muslim community has a significant number of political conservatives sympathetic to many issues within the Republican Party platform.

The GOP presidential hopefuls’ stand on Islam and Muslims has been varied. Their stands have ranged from being thoughtful and considerate to being discourteous, rude and unappreciative of the history, losing potential support.

Some candidates have clearly opted to try to win votes by denigrating Islam and disparaging Muslims. Taking the lead in the anti-Muslim frenzy is Herman Cain, who has consistently held a hostile discourse on Islam, belittling almost anything or anyone resonating Muslim. Among many instances we may take as example Cain’s opposition to the construction of an Islamic Center in Murfreesboro, Tenn., unreasonably arguing that it’s not religious discrimination for a community to ban a mosque. On this same line, Cain has also affirmed that he wouldn’t appoint Muslims to his cabinet and even suggested to impose a loyalty test on any Muslim before allowing him to serve in his administration.

His anti-Muslim rhetoric returned recently when he expressed that more than half of American Muslims are extremists based on a “trusted adviser” who informed him so.

Rick Perry has wisely distanced himself from the bigoted rhetoric and instead has a history of good and positive relations with the Muslims community. Perry endorsed Texas public high school teacher education programs on Islamic history. As governor he signed a Halal Law, which makes it a criminal offense to sell Halal and non-Halal meat in the same store without specifically labeling the two and to misrepresent non-Halal meat as being Halal. Governor Perry has held constructive ties with the Muslim Aga Khan’s community and hosted their world known leader on his visit to Texas. He followed up by attending the inauguration of their Ismaili Jamatkhana Islamic Center in Sugar Land, Texas in 2002; and later laid the first brick for another of their centers in Plano, Texas in 2005. On the other hand, Perry’s ties to the rest of the mainstream Muslim community as a whole are scarce, and his posture is mostly perceived as neutral, with neither “pro” nor “against” community stances.

Mitt Romney’s relations with the American Muslim community have not been smooth. Recently, the Council of American Islamic Relations (CAIR) asked the presidential hopeful for the ouster of Dr. Walid Phares a recently appointed foreign policy adviser to his team. Phares authored “Future Jihad: Terrorist Strategies Against America” and also acts as an advisor to the U.S. Congress on the Middle East. According to CAIR he worked as an official in the Lebanese Forces, a Christian militia, and other militias that reportedly took part in various massacres of Muslims. The controversial appointment has certainly created a wave of controversy within the American Muslim community that waits for Romney to take their concerns into consideration.

Newt Gingrich’s stance on issues related to American Muslims and Islam has been scornful. Falling victim to the Muslim hysteria on the debate on the Ground Zero Mosque, Gingrich compared the Islamic Community Center project to building a Nazi monument outside the Holocaust Museum. This was clearly a very insensitive position that will take more than a simple apology — not that it is expected — to amend.

Michele Bachmann has not demonstrated a capacity to engage the American Muslim community neither shown capacity to understand and respect diversity. Her comments on the civil uprisings that took place in France back in 2005 were very discomforting: “Those who are coming into France, which has a beautiful culture, the French culture is actually diminished. It’s going away. And just with the population in France, they are losing Western Europeans, and it’s being taken over by a Muslim ethic. Not that Muslims are bad, but they are not assimilating.”

Rick Santorum has joined Gingrich’s Islam-bashing team, expressing misleading comments on the question of sharia taking over the U.S. court system. On the most recent debate Santorum was even more assertive on his opinion on Muslims. When asked if he would support ethnic and religious profiling he replied: “The folks who are most likely to be committing these crimes … obviously Muslims would be someone you’d look at, absolutely.”

Among all candidates, libertarian leaning Ron Paul seems to be the one who have consistently pronounced himself distant from any expression that could be construed as Islamophobic. He issued firm statements condemning Pastor Terry Jones’ controversial call for a “Burn the Quran Day.” In September 2010 Paul stated: “This blame of all Muslims for the atrocities of 9/11 only makes things worse — especially since it wasn’t the Taliban of Afghanistan that committed the atrocities.” More recently, on a CBS interview, Paul said that al Qaeda itself cited American intervention in the region as its motivation for attacking the U.S. and “to argue the case that they want to do us harm because we’re free and prosperous I think is a very, very dangerous notion because it’s not true.”

John Huntsman is another candidate that for the most part has rejected to take a ride on the Islamophobia train that most republic candidates not only designed but are now fueling and giving hand-detailed maintenance.

The comments and actions that vilify Islam and Muslims — or any other religion and its practitioners — by the Republican Party presidential hopefuls show an evident betrayal of commitment to the freedom of religion consecrated in the U.S. Constitution. Exploiting Muslims for political gain will undoubtedly alienate them from a significant section of the voting public who hold religion dear to their hearts.

Follow Wilfredo Amr Ruiz on Twitter:


3 replies
  1. Mahmoud El-Yousseph
    Mahmoud El-Yousseph says:

    Newt – what about your affairs, including with future wife #2 while #1 was receiving cancer treatment and with future wife#3 when you were still married to #2.

    Cain- the Cain Train was light on the brain and is now going down the drain. Who am I to complain?

    Santorum: he adds insult, subtracts pleasure, divides attention and multiplies ignorance. Would you vote for a candidate who refers to Africa as a state and who claims the Holy Quran is written in Islamic rather than Arabic?

    Bachmann- she is a media slot. She even make Sara Palin look smart.

    Paul- Never voted for a Republican in my life. But if I do, Ron Paul is my choice.

  2. kamalgameel
    kamalgameel says:

    elsalam alaykom, I think we should not take much care about what the others think adout us, I think we muslims incloding our well known Olama know very little about real islam , unless we solve this very big qustion we will fail in every thing we try , we will not find the straight line – alsirat almustageem- which leads to peace with our selves & the others . I know & i am sure : real islam is very advanced & is diffret from the confused ideas in our mindes , it is desined for the benfit of muslims & all mankind & live on earth, It is very easy to prove that : the american constitution is not only not contradictigting with the real islamic constiution but it is part of it . Soon the time will come to find out what small our diffrences with western christians are ,Thank you , kamalgameel .

  3. Mahmoud El-Yousseph
    Mahmoud El-Yousseph says:

    Muslims critics are barking up the wrong tree

    Dear editor,

    Muslims critics are barking up the wrong tree. On Oct. 9 and 10, a group of loosely connected protesters plan to host anti-Muslim demonstrations in front of at least 20 mosques across the United States. Here is a partial list of the places where events are scheduled to take place:

    Dearborn, Michigan; Amarillo, Texas; Jacksonville, Florida; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; Medford, Oregon; and Oakland, California. Some organizers are asking participants to leave their weapon at home, others like the one who organized last May Armed Biker Rally at Phoenix Islamic Center will be armed with automatic weapons.

    These anti-Muslim organizations are using this event to protest the Iran Nuclear Deal and the Resettlement of Syrian Refugees program in the United States.

    Why aren’t those misguided patriots protesting at The White House or the U.S. State Department instead?

    If those hatemongers don’t like refugees coming to our country, then they should stop voting for politicians who love to bomb the daylight out of other nations.

    Had those Islamophobes been genuine in their concern, they would have reached out to their fellow Muslims for a dialogue; by talking and listening to them. However, converging on local Mosques with automatic weapons is short of declaring war on America’s Muslims. We do not live in the jungle and violence against Muslims is not the answer!

    The United States Code prohibits fire arms at or on any church, synagogue, mosque, or other place of worship, unless the church, synagogue, mosque, or other place of worship posts or permits otherwise.

    Lets all hope that the police, K-9 Unit and the Joint Terrorism Task Force will be there to ensure public safety and arrest anyone who wishes to take the law into his own hand.